Hi, On Tue, 16 Jan 2007, Andy Parkins wrote: > On Monday 2007 January 15 21:56, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > > I do not think you are interested in "not these two but everything > > else". You are interested in maint, master, next, pu and man. You > > can get away by saying "not these two but everything else" only > > because you are implicitly trusting me not to publish insane number of > > random throw-away branches left and right. > > Nope. I think I'm right. You're right that I'm trusting you not to > publish an insane number of branches, but that holds for the glob-mode > only, regardless of whether the NOT fetches are in place. The sort of > thing I imagine happening is that as maintainer you suddenly say - I > think 1.5.0 is so good that we'll maintain it for longer than usual. > In which case we would suddenly get a branch for maint-1.5.0. I would > want that branch, but I still don't want man, html and todo. Fine. Submit a patch. And if that patch makes git-fetch not as fragile as I expect it to do, I am not opposed to inclusion. I'll just not use that feature. And I'll still find your usage confused. Ciao, Dscho - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html