Re: [ITCH] Specify refspec without remote

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Junio C Hamano wrote:
> On the other hand, a good thing is that the remote.pushdefault makes
> perfect sense whether you use the upstream mode or the matching
> mode.  I vaguely recall that I kept telling you that the overall
> default should be there and per-branch stuff can come later if/as
> needed, to which you resisted for a couple of rounds of reviews and
> I couldn't quite figure out where the resistance was coming from.
> Come to think of it, perhaps that might be rooted in the same
> reason of not thinking about users of "matching" mode.  I dunno, and
> I do not think it matters.

remote.pushdefault is simple; it doesn't open up interesting
possibilities like branch.<name>.pushremote does (I mentioned
branch-specific r/w access somewhere else in the thread).  Because of
my obsession with "current", I never think of the repository as a
whole but each branch separately tracking a remote.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]