Junio C Hamano wrote: > And I also misread "we currently don't handle" above as "but we > really should allow adding d/f when d is at the top of the working > tree of another project", but that was not what you meant to say. > Instead, "We do not notice such a bad case in today's code yet" was > what you meant. But if we are to use "there are cases" in [1/n] and > start [2/n] with "Now we have renamed, let's do this", then we do > not have to bother saying anything in [1/n] about the upcoming > change in [2/n], especially the patches come back-to-back in a > single series. Exactly. Yeah, I don't think you patch makes sense as a standalone anyway: I'll use appropriate wording when I roll the series, so it follows nicely. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html