Re: [PATCH] http-backend: respect GIT_NAMESPACE with dumb clients

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 2:45 PM, Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 11:25:39PM +0200, Thomas Rast wrote:
>
>> At the risk of repeating something that's been said already -- I only
>> skimmed the thread -- this test breaks in today's pu on my machine.  I
>> get:
>> [...]
>> --- expect    2013-04-08 21:24:36.571874540 +0000
>> +++ actual    2013-04-08 21:24:36.579874619 +0000
>> @@ -1,3 +1,2 @@
>> -453190505bf07f7513bed9839da875eb3610f807     HEAD
>>  453190505bf07f7513bed9839da875eb3610f807     refs/heads/master
>>  453190505bf07f7513bed9839da875eb3610f807     refs/namespaces/ns/refs/heads/master
>> not ok 14 - backend respects namespaces
>
> I think what is in pu is not yet reflecting the latest discussion. HEAD
> should not be included in the simulated info/refs, but should be
> generated, respecting namespaces, whenever a client retrieves the HEAD
> file directly.
>
> It looks like the thread was left here;
>
>   http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/220237
>
> and we are just waiting for John's re-roll.
>

I should be able to get this done either later today or later this
week. Life/$DAYJOB has been taking up the time slot I was spending on
this the past few days.

John
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]