Re: [PATCH 0/3] Using a bit more decoration

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes:

> [1] The thing that made me think about this was making a version of
>     paint_down_to_common that could keep a separate color for each
>     source, rather than only PARENT1 and PARENT2. That would let us do
>     the "--contains" traversal in a breadth-first way, but calculate the
>     answer simultaneously for all sources (i.e., avoid the depth-first
>     "go to roots" problem that the current "tag --contains" has if you
>     do not use timestamp cutoffs).

Yes, show-branch operates independently of rev-list machinery, hence
can use full set of bits, but the full set of bits in a word is not
always sufficient and it can be helped greatly with such an unbound
set of bits machinery.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]