Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > Junio C Hamano wrote: >> "git log -p .gitmodules" would be a way to review what changed in >> the information about submodules. Don't you need "git log-link" for >> exactly the same reason why you need "git diff-link" in the first >> place? >> >> So you may not have suggested it, but I suspect that was only >> because you haven't had enough time to think things through. > > What is this git log -p .gitmodules doing? It's walking down the > commit history, and picking out the commits in which that blob > changed. Then it's diffing the blobs in those commits with each > other. Why is git log -p <link> any different? We already know how > to diff blobs, and we just need a way to diff links. You already forget what you invented "git diff-link" as a "solution" for, perhaps? By recording the submodules themselve and information _about_ the submodules separately (the latter is in .gitmodules), "git diff A" can show the difference in submodule A, while "git diff .gitmodules" can show a change, which is a possibly in-working-tree-only proposed change, in information about submoudules. Once you start recording the latter also at path "A", it becomes unclear what "git diff A" should show. That is what I said in the message, to which you invented "diff-link" as a solution to the "unclear"-ness. Am I misremembering the flow of discussion in this thread? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html