Re: Commit signing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2007-01-15 05:43:36 -0500, Shawn O. Pearce wrote:

> If you don't trust the owner, but you trust the pusher, than using 1
> annotated tag per push is reasonable and gives you something to
> verify the repository owner isn't playing games. If you don't trust
> the pusher than you should be reviewing the changes before deciding
> to keep them in your project.
>
> But even then annotated tags are overkill. You could just receive
> the commit SHA1 out-of-band from the pusher (e.g. email, like
> Junio's hidden X-master-at header) and verify that by hand. 8 digits
> is probably more than enough to hand-verify the entire commit chain
> you are receiving.

No. You've just constructed a system whose security depends on a
32-bit hash. This is one of those situations where you really do need
all the digits.

-- 
Karl Hasselström, kha@xxxxxxxxxxx
      www.treskal.com/kalle
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]