Re: [PATCH v2 11/13] remote-hg: force remote push

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@xxxxxxxxx> writes:


[...]

>> will need to play by those rules.
>
> No, we don't. The fact that you say so doesn't make it so.

Then perhaps we have different goals [1].  I don't know any Git User that
would prefer to have an Hg upstream accessed through remote-hg.  We have
to assume that every Git (remote-hg) User is dealing with Hg Team that
is setting the rules, since otherwise Git User would just change the
whole damn project to Git and be done with it.  In that sense, it is
inappropriate to do things that are likely to make Hg Team yell at Git
User.

> I create a branch felipec-bookmarks, and I push as many heads as I
> wish. Who will get affected? Nobody.

Every Hg user will see those heads by default every time they run 'hg
log' or 'hg heads'.

> And who says we are committing upstream?

The discussion is moot if you don't want to push your commits upstream.


[1] As I mentioned earlier, I don't need either tool any more.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]