Re: [PATCH v2 11/13] remote-hg: force remote push

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 10:44 AM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> Ideally we shouldn't do this, as it's not recommended in mercurial
>> documentation, but there's no other way to push multiple bookmarks (on
>> the same branch), which would be the behavior most similar to git.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>
> In the previous round you wanted me to exclude this one to force
> split head at the remote, and I saw you and Max Horn discussing
> (rather, shouting at each other ;-) why it is needed/desirable.

No, that was "don't update bookmarks unnecessarily", and it seems you
skipped it appropriately.

> Have you changed your mind and you want this as part of the series,
> or is it just you forgot to exclude it?

Nope, I still see no reason not to push this.

-- 
Felipe Contreras
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]