Hi, Le lundi 01 avril 2013 à 12:57 -0700, Junio C Hamano a écrit : > The user could have said "git merge $(git rev-parse v1.0.0)"; we > shouldn't mark it as "Merge commit '15999998fb...'" as the merge > name, even though such an invocation might be crazy. > > We could even read the "tag " header from the tag object and replace > the object name the user gave us, but let's not lose the information > by doing so, at least not yet. > > Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> Thanks for the patch. I gave it a try and found the behavior rather good. Merging a tag object by its name or by its object-id are now using the same behavor: it is more consistent. Tested-by: Yann Droneaud <ydroneaud@xxxxxxxxxx> PS: there's a typo in the commit title :) Regards. -- Yann Droneaud OPTEYA -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html