Re: [PATCH 1/4] Remove unnecessary call_depth parameter in merge-recursive.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Alex Riesen <fork0@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Shawn O. Pearce, Sun, Jan 14, 2007 06:28:33 +0100:
> > Because the output_indent always matches the call_depth value
> > there is no reason to pass around the call_depth to the merge
> > function during each recursive invocation.
> 
> Actually, you removed output_indent, not call_depth.

Yeaaaaa.  That happened because I amended the commit.  The first
version of it kept output_indent and replaced all call_depth with
output_indent.  I was then going to do another patch to rename
output_indent -> call_depth, but I noticed the patch would be
about the same size as that one and would affect the same lines,
so I just amended it.  Then I didn't edit the commit message.

-- 
Shawn.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]