"Shawn O. Pearce" <spearce@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > If a project has a really huge number of tags (such as several > thousand tags) then we are likely to have nearly a hundred tags in > some buckets. Scanning those buckets as linked lists could take > a large amount of time if done repeatedly during history traversal. I think this is a good idea -- but would you still need the 256 buckets if you do this? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html