Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] Support triangular workflows

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes:

> Sometimes it's annoyingly verbose to break down a compound function. But
> I think in this case, you can make your tests more robust by just
> checking the affirmative that the ref is still where we expect it to be,
> like:
>
>   check_push_result up_repo $the_first_commit heads/master
>
> Sorry if that was a bit long-winded. I think that practically speaking,
> it is not a likely source of problems in this case. But it's an
> anti-pattern in our tests that I think is worth mentioning.

Thanks.  That is one of the reasons why we do not want to see too
many custom test helper functions.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]