Re: [PATCH 1/4] attr.c::path_matches(): the basename is part of the pathname

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 1:49 AM, Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 11:39:28AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
>> The function takes two strings (pathname and basename) as if they
>> are independent strings, but in reality, the latter is always
>> pointing into a substring in the former.
>>
>> Clarify this relationship by expressing the latter as an offset into
>> the former.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> This is a huge improvement in maintainability. My initial fix attempt
> was to just xstrdup() the strings (knowing that the performance would be
> horrible, but I was still investigating correctness issues at that
> point). And of course I ran into this same issue as I tried to make a
> copy of pathname.
>
> So even without the rest of the fix, this is definitely a good idea. :)

match_{base,path}name and their exclude callers do the same thing. I
guess I'm used to it and did not see the maintainability issue. Maybe
we should do the same there too.
-- 
Duy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]