Re: [PATCH 0/5] Verify GPG signatures when merging and extend %G? pretty string

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Sebastian Götte <jaseg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Rebased it onto the current 'master'. The second patch fixes that the GPG
> status parser ignores the first line of GPG status output (that would be caught
> by the new merge signature verification test case).

Thanks.

Does it still make sure that it won't be fooled by the expected
string appearing in the middle of a line, not at the beginning?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]