Re: [PATCH] merge-recursive: do not report the resulting tree object name

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Sat, 13 Jan 2007, Jakub Narebski wrote:

> Junio C Hamano wrote:
> 
> > I do not think we need to show 1..15 at all, perhaps without
> > "export GIT_MERGE_BASE_DEBUG=YesPlease".
> 
> Or a -v/--verbose (or even -v -v -v) flag set.

... and you'd pass them from git-pull to git-merge to git-merge-recursive? 
Three different programs parse the same option? And worse, the other 
strategies ignore the setting? What about strategies people implemented 
on _their_ side, which do not know about the "-v" flag? I don't think so.

Ciao,
Dscho

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]