Johannes Sixt <j6t <at> kdbg.org> writes: > > I also wonder if > > > > label : > > > > should also be caught, or is it too weird format to be worth > > supporting? > > It's easy to support, by inserting another [ \t] before the first colon. > So, why not? This is really nitpicking, but if we do it, then it should be "[ \t]*". And the "*" after the label should actually be a "+". So the full line becomes "!^[ \t]*[A-Za-z_][A-Za-z_0-9]+[ \t]*:([^:]|$)\n" But then I've never actually seen git putting labels incorrectly into the hunk headers while I did see the problem this patch tries to fix, with wrong method appearing in the header because the correct one was skipped due to this ignore regex, quite a few times in the past. Regards, VZ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html