Re: [PATCH] t7600: merge tag shoud create a merge commit

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 03:56:15PM +0100, Yann Droneaud wrote:

> Le 22.03.2013 15:48, Junio C Hamano a écrit :
> >>
> >>It's not in final shape: the line
> >>
> >>    EDITOR=false test_must_fail git merge signed
> >
> >Because test_must_fail is a shell function, single-shot environment
> >assignment like this should not be used.
> 
> It's used throughout the test. The test 'merge --no-edit tag should
> skip editor' is using it.

It's OK to do:

  SINGLE_SHOT=foo some_real_command

and it's OK to do:

  some_fun args

but it's not OK to do:

  SINGLE_SHOT=foo some_function args

Because some POSIX shells do not create a new environment for the
function (and SINGLE_SHOT will persist after the call, polluting the
environment).

> Before posting my half useful test, I used "EDITOR=false
> test_must_fail set" in --verbose mode to find if EDITOR was correctly
> defined passed test_must_fail, and it was.

I do not think there is a shell that does not set it; it is only that
some shells do not _unset_ it.

-Peff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]