Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes: > I think this is OK, and I do not mind if it gets applied. But what I was > hinting at in my earlier mail was that we might want to do this (I have > it as a separate patch on top of your 3/6 here, but it would make more > sense squashed in): I would prefer to see a preparatory patch to teach mk_test/mk_empty to _always_ take the new name (i.e. the result of your patch) and then do whatever new things on top. By the way, I am planning to _not_ look at new stuff today. I'd rather see known recent regressions addressed (and unknown ones discovered and squashed) before we move forward, and I would appreciate if regular contributors did the same. Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html