Re: [PATCH 0/8] Improve git-status --ignored

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Duy Nguyen <pclouds@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 11:08 AM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Karsten Blees <karsten.blees@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>
>>> This patch series addresses several bugs and performance issues in
>>> .gitignore processing that came up in the inotify discussion.
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> How does this interact with the nd/read-directory-recursive-optim
>> topic that has been cooking for a while?
>
> I think 8/8 is another version of nd/read-directory-recursive-optim

Yeah, it seems so; even though the series is much larger, overall it
looks to me a cleaner solution without a specific special case.

Would we we better off kicking nd/read-directory-recursive-optim
back to 'pu' (and eventually ejecting it) and replacing it with a
reroll of Karsten's series when it comes, perhaps?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]