Re: [ITCH] Specify refspec without remote

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 6:53 PM, Ramkumar Ramachandra
<artagnon@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> git push . foo:bar
>
> A URL may be a path to a git repository, and '.' is a valid path.
> Currently, 'git push .' seems to push to the current repository (what
> does that even mean?).  For something truly unambiguous, we'll have to
> use a character that's disallowed in URLs and isn't interpreted by the
> shell- I can't seem to think of one.  Otherwise, we'll have to
> fallback to using heuristics anyway.

Yeah that was a stupid suggestion. There's also "-". Right now git
push accepts it as a remote name, but I think in general "-" alone has
always had a special meaning in UNIX world. We could put a new meaning
to it (literal "-" directory can be specified with "./-"). Not totally
sure if "-" is allowed in refspec though.
-- 
Duy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]