John Keeping <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 10:40:55AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> John Keeping <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> >> > git-hash-object(1) implies that it will apply the clean filter and EOL >> > conversion when it's given a path to a file in the working tree (as it >> > is here). Is that not the case? >> >> Applying clean to smudged contents _ought to_ recover clean version, >> but is that "ought to" something you would want to rely on? > > How does git-status figure out that file that has been touch'd does not > have unstaged changes without relying on this? Surely this case is no > different from that? I just checked. ce_modified_check_fs() does ce_compare_data() which does the same "hash the path and compare the resulting hash". So I think we are OK. Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html