Re: Tag peeling peculiarities

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Michael Haggerty <mhagger@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> It is not
> clear to me whether the prohibition of tags outside of refs/tags should
> be made more airtight or whether the peeling of tags outside of
> refs/tags should be fixed.

Retroactively forbidding presense/creation of tags outside the
designated refs/tags hierarchy will not fly.  I think we should peel
them when we are reading from "# pack-refs with: peeled" version.

Theoretically, we could introduce "# pack-refs with: fully-peeled"
that records peeled versions for _all_ annotated tags even in
unusual places, but that would be introducing problems to existing
versions of the software to cater to use cases that is not blessed
officially, so I doubt it has much value.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]