Re: Clean up write_in_full() users

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I actually think "read_in_full()" should get the same loving tender care 
> too, for all the same reasons. I think "read_or_die()" is totally broken. 
> Anybody who uses "read_or_die()" is buggy by definition, since it will do 
> a partial read AND NOT RETURN ANY INDICATION THAT IT WAS PARTIAL!

AFAIK the only user of read_or_die is sha1_file.c when it reads in
the 12 byte pack header and the 20 byte pack trailer to "quickly"
verify the packfile is sane before using it.  If I recall correctly
it was correct when I created it, but the read_in_full refactoring
changed it.

-- 
Shawn.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]