Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] match_basename: use strncmp instead of strcmp

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 7:11 PM, Antoine Pelisse <apelisse@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> By the way, if we know the length of the string, we could use memcmp.
>>> This one is allowed to compare 4-bytes at a time (he doesn't care
>>> about end of string). This is true because the value of the length
>>> parameter is no longer "at most".
>>
>> We still need to worry about access violation after NUL when two
>> strings have different lengths. That could be avoided in this
>> particular case, but I think it's too fragile.
>
> Why would we need to compare if the strings don't have the same length
> ? We already do that in combine-diff.c:append_lost().

Watching movie and replying to git@ don't mix. You're right we don't
need to compare if lengths are different. What was I thinking..
-- 
Duy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]