Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > A few suggestions on the release notes (you may safely ignore) They both look very sensible, at least to me. Perhaps like this? Thanks. Documentation/RelNotes/1.8.2.txt | 60 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------------- 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/RelNotes/1.8.2.txt b/Documentation/RelNotes/1.8.2.txt index 78c6577..fc606ae 100644 --- a/Documentation/RelNotes/1.8.2.txt +++ b/Documentation/RelNotes/1.8.2.txt @@ -1,19 +1,8 @@ Git v1.8.2 Release Notes ======================== -Backward compatibility notes ----------------------------- - -In the next major release Git 2.0 (not *this* one), we will change the -behavior of the "git push" command. - -When "git push [$there]" does not say what to push, we have used the -traditional "matching" semantics so far (all your branches were sent -to the remote as long as there already are branches of the same name -over there). We will use the "simple" semantics that pushes the -current branch to the branch with the same name, only when the current -branch is set to integrate with that remote branch. There is a user -preference configuration variable "push.default" to change this. +Backward compatibility notes (this release) +------------------------------------------- "git push $there tag v1.2.3" used to allow replacing a tag v1.2.3 that already exists in the repository $there, if the rewritten tag @@ -22,22 +11,41 @@ that the old tag v1.2.3 points at. This was found to be error prone and starting with this release, any attempt to update an existing ref under refs/tags/ hierarchy will fail, without "--force". -When "git add -u" and "git add -A", that does not specify what paths -to add on the command line, is run from inside a subdirectory, the +When "git add -u" and "git add -A" that does not specify what paths +to add on the command line is run from inside a subdirectory, the scope of the operation has always been limited to the subdirectory. Many users found this counter-intuitive, given that "git commit -a" and other commands operate on the entire tree regardless of where you -are. In this release, these commands give warning in such a case and -encourage the user to say "git add -u/-A ." instead when restricting -the scope to the current directory. - -At Git 2.0 (not *this* one), we plan to change these commands without -pathspec to operate on the entire tree. Forming a habit to type "." -when you mean to limit the command to the current working directory -will protect you against the planned future change, and that is the -whole point of the new message (there will be no configuration -variable to squelch this warning---it goes against the "habit forming" -objective). +are. In this release, these commands give a warning message that +suggests the users to use "git add -u/-A ." when they want to limit +the scope to the current directory; doing so will squelch the message, +while training their fingers. + + +Backward compatibility notes (for Git 2.0) +------------------------------------------ + +When "git push [$there]" does not say what to push, we have used the +traditional "matching" semantics so far (all your branches were sent +to the remote as long as there already are branches of the same name +over there). In Git 2.0, the default will change to the "simple" +semantics that pushes the current branch to the branch with the same +name, only when the current branch is set to integrate with that +remote branch. There is a user preference configuration variable +"push.default" to change this. If you are an old-timer who is used +to the "matching" semantics, you can set it to "matching" to keep the +traditional behaviour. If you want to live in the future early, +you can set it to "simple" today without waiting for Git 2.0. + +When "git add -u" and "git add -A", that does not specify what paths +to add on the command line is run from inside a subdirectory, these +commands will operate on the entire tree in Git 2.0 for consistency +with "git commit -a" and other commands. Because there will be no +mechanism to make "git add -u" behave as if "git add -u .", it is +important for those who are used to "git add -u" (without pathspec) +updating the index only for paths in the current subdirectory to start +training their fingers to explicitly say "git add -u ." when they mean +it before Git 2.0 comes. Updates since v1.8.1 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html