Re: [PATCH] git-push.txt: mention about remote.*.push when no refspec is given

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 1:09 AM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I agree that saying what it is, what it does or what it is for
> upfront (i.e. "Specifies what are pushed") before how it is spelled
> is an improvement.  I however think describing "If not specified"
> here was a mistake, and you are making it worse by burying the
> description of what happens when <refspec>... are missing in the
> middle of the description for <refspec>...
>
> I would rather see this done in the direction the attached "how
> about doing it this way" patch illustrates.  The way how "where" and
> "what" are determined when the command line does not specify is the
> proparty of the entire command, not of an individual parameter.

I agree your patch looks better than mine. Put it on 'pu', perhaps?
-- 
Duy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]