On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 11:21 AM, David Michael Barr <b@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 9:05 AM, Paul Campbell <pcampbell@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 2:28 AM, Kindjal <kindjal@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> David Michael Barr <b <at> rr-dav.id.au> writes: >>> >>>> From a quick survey, it appears there are no more than 55 patches >>>> squashed into the submitted patch. >>>> As I have an interest in git-subtree for maintaining the out-of-tree >>>> version of vcs-svn/ and a desire to improve my rebase-fu, I am tempted >>>> to make some sense of the organic growth that happened on GitHub. >>>> It doesn't appear that anyone else is willing to do this, so I doubt >>>> there will be any duplication of effort. >>>> >>> >>> What is the status of the work on git-subtree described in this thread? >>> It looks like it's stalled. >>> >> >> I hadn't been aware of that patch. Reading the thread David Michael >> Barr was going to try picking the patch apart into sensible chunks. >> > > Sorry for not updating the thread. I did end up moving onto other things. > I quickly realised the reason for globbing all the patches together was > that the individual patches were not well contained. > That is single patches with multiple unrelated changes and multiple > patches changing the same things in different directions. > To me this means that the first step is to curate the history. > >> If this work is still needing done I'd like to volunteer. > > You're most welcome. Sorry again for abandoning the thread. > > -- > David Michael Barr Okay, I'll start picking the patch apart this week then feedback when I have a plan to tackle it all. -- Paul [W] Campbell -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html