Re: [bug report] git-am applying maildir patches in reverse

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 05:52:31PM -0500, Jeff King wrote:
> ...
>> The maildir spec explicitly says that readers should not make
>> assumptions about the content of the filenames. Mutt happens to write
>> them as:
>> 
>>   ${epoch_seconds}.${pid}_${seq}.${host}
>> 
>> so in practice, sorting them kind of works. Except that ...
>> << it does not work >> ...
> That ordering is not necessarily useful.
> ...
> So it is somewhat against the maildir spec, but I think in practice it
> would help.

I do not think it would help, unless these epoch_seconds are the
sender timestamps.  And the number of digits in epoch-seconds for
recent messages would be the same, so ordering textually would be
sufficient if ordering by timestamp were.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]