Re: What's cooking in git.git (Feb 2013, #05; Tue, 12)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Miles Bader <miles@xxxxxxx> writes:

> Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>  * Introduce "git add --ignore-removal" option in the release after
>>    the current cycle (a new feature is too late for this cycle):
>
> Too late in the cycle even if the option is simply ignored ... ?
>
> [To extend the range of git versions where it's not an error]

I'd feel safer to have enough time to cook the "alleged no-op"
before merging it to 'master' and include it in a release.

Possible implementation mistakes aside, "--ignore-removal" is
probably too long to type, we haven't even discussed if it deserves
a short-and-sweet single letter option, the obvious "-i" is not
available, etc. etc.  I do not think we have a concensus that the
transition plan outlined is a good way to go in the first place.

So, I do think it is a bit too late for this cycle, especially when
we still have doubts about the design. Actually it is *I* who have
doubts; I do not even know if other people share the doubts or they
support the direction wholeheartedly.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]