2013/2/19 Ramkumar Ramachandra: > > What is your usecase? If you have a local branch with the same name > as on the remote, why wouldn't you want to push-to-update it when you > make changes in the branch? In other words, why doesn't push.default > = matching suffice for most practical purposes. > >> ... or branch.<name>.pushremote can support some kind of a "none" value? > > Not a bad idea at all, provided you tell me your usecase. The question is infact about branches who are not on the remote. push.default=matching wouldn't upload the branches which are not there already. push --all on other hand pushes .. all (as expected :-))... Its difficult for me to manage quickly, lets say, "news-to-push/*" and "crazy-ideas/*" branches ... Blind. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html