"W. Trevor King" <wking@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 06:23:11PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> "W. Trevor King" <wking@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> > [[rewriting-one-commit]] >> > Rewriting a single commit >> > ------------------------- >> > @@ -2552,71 +2558,81 @@ $ git commit --amend >> > which will replace the old commit by a new commit incorporating your >> > changes, giving you a chance to edit the old commit message first. >> > >> >> ... A lot of lines removed here ... >> >> > +[[reordering-patch-series]] >> >> This change makes the [[rewriting-one-commit]] section say "We >> already saw you can do 'commit --amend'" and nothing else. It makes >> me wonder if the remaining section is worth keeping if we go this >> route. > > I think there should be some mention of `commit --amend` in the > rewriting history section. It's a pretty straightforward idea though, > so there's not all that much to say about it ;). I do think teaching "commit --amend", "rebase" and "rebase -i" together makes sense. It just felt that the remaining piece on "commit --amend" looked too thin in the substance, but it may be a good change in the existing flow of text. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html