Re: [PATCH v3] branch: show rebase/bisect info when possible instead of "(no branch)"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 1:35 AM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> We may want to refactor wt_status_print_state() and its callee a bit
> so that it and this part can share the logic without duplication and
> risk implementing subtly different decision.  wt_status used to have
> clean separation between collection phase and presentation phase,
> but the wall between the phases seems deteriorated over time as more
> "in progress" crufts have been piled on top.
>
> Such a refactoring may look larger than necessary, but on the other
> hand, I do not see this feature very useful if it can over time
> drift away from what we will see in "git status", so...

OK. I'll wait until nd/status-show-in-progress is merged to master,
then rework this patch on top.
-- 
Duy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]