Re: [PATCH] Replacing the system call pread() with lseek()/xread()/lseek() sequence.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 9 Jan 2007, Shawn O. Pearce wrote:

> Andy Whitcroft <apw@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > How likely are we ever to be in the right place here?  Seems vanishingly
> > small putting us firmly in the four syscalls per call space.  I wonder
> > if git ever actually cares about the seek location.  ie if we could stop
> > reading and resetting it.  Probabally not worth working it out I guess
> > as any _sane_ system has one.
> 
> Andy's right actually.  If we are using pread() we aren't relying
> on the current file pointer.  Which means its unnecessary to get
> the current pointer before seeking to the requested offset, and its
> unnecessary to restore it before the git_pread() function returns.

No this is wrong.  The original offset _has_ to be preserved.  
index-pack counts on it.


Nicolas
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]