Junio C Hamano wrote: > Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> Jonathan Nieder wrote: >>> Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote: >>> >>>> And yes, a regular `git push origin refs/for/master` is just retarded. >>> >>> The usual incantation is "git push gerrit HEAD:refs/for/master". Is >>> the code review creation push that uses a different branchname from >>> the branch the integrator pulls what seems backward, or is it the need >>> to specify a refname at all on the command line? >> >> How else would you design a system to differentiate between a >> push-for-review, and push-to-update-ref? > > You don't have to. > > If the reviewed result is merged on the server side and appear on > 'master', nobody has to push to update refs/heads/master. I'm sorry, I meant differentiating between push-for-review and push-for-personal-work. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html