Michael J Gruber <git@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > As for the triangle remote, I really think we should clean up the > situation regarding push, pushurlinsteadof and the various different and > inconclusive output formats of "git remote" (with or without "-v", with > or without a remote name) first, before introducing yet another way to > twist things around. "git push downstream" does not hurt any kittens > (while git remote ouput does, somehwat). As people tend to fetch more often than they push if they are working on a real project where the others as a whole will be far more productive than any single individual, I agree that keeping "git fetch" (or "git pull") lazy by having "origin" point at where they fetch from and be a bit more explicit in "git push" would actually make sense. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html