Re: [RFC] test-lib.sh: No POSIXPERM for cygwin

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 07.02.13 20:35, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Ramsay Jones <ramsay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> Torsten Bögershausen wrote:
>>> t0070 and t1301 fail when running the test suite under cygwin.
>>> Skip the failing tests by unsetting POSIXPERM.
>> t1301 does not fail for me. (WIN XP (SP3) on NTFS)
> Others run Cygwin with vfat or some other filesystem, and some of
> them do not cope will with POSIXPERM, perhaps?
>
> Not having POSIXPERM by default for Cygwin may be a saner default
> than having one, if we have to pick one.
>
> It may be debatable to have this default as platform attribute,
> though.
>
Yes, 1301 passes on cygwin 1.5, but not on 1.7.
And it breaks on VFAT, for all kind of OS.

Thanks for comments, I'll put more investigations on my todo stack.
/Torsten


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]