Re: Proposal: branch.<name>.remotepush

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote:
> Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote:
>> And yes, a regular `git push origin refs/for/master` is just retarded.
>
> Actually a git config remote.origin.push refs/heads/*:refs/for/* makes
> more sense here.

Sorry about all that confusion.  The first line should be `git push
origin master:refs/for/master`, but a rule like refs/head/*:refs/for/*
is insufficient: what if I want refs/head/*:refs/heads/* for one set
of branches (private ones that I don't send for review), and
refs/heads/*:refs/for/* for another set (which I send for review)?
That certainly won't play well will the existing remote.origin.push;
it'd have to behave as an override.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]