Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] Hiding refs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> I think there's a simpler way to do this, which is that:
>
>  * New clients supporting v2 of the protocol send some piece of data
>    that would break old servers.
>
>  * If that fails the new client goes "oh jeeze, I guess it's an old
>    server", and try again with the old protocol.
>
>  * The client then saves a date (or the version the server gave us)
>    indicating that it tried the new protocol on that remote, tries
>    again sometime later.

For that to work, the new server needs to wait for the client to
speak first.  How would that server handle old clients who expect to
be spoken first?  Wait with a read timeout (no timeout is the right
timeout for everybody)?

> We already covered in previous discussions how this would be simpler
> with the HTTP protocol,...

Yes, that is a solved problem.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]