Re: Why is ident_is_sufficient different on Windows?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> I suspect somebody from the Windows camp saw a patch I posted
>> without the ifdef, noticed that there is a problem to expect
>> IDENT_NAME_GIVEN to be set on Windows for some reason, and resulted
>> in a reroll of the function in that shape.
>>
>> I didn't find anything in the list archive, though.  So I am
>> stumped.
>
> The only thing I can think of is that on Unix we can guess name from
> GECOS, which could be considered sufficiently your name, while on
> Windows we probably do not get anything useful there.

http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/137312/focus=137345

These days, we encourage setting user.name explicitly even on a
system on which it is likely that we will see a good GECOS value, so
removing the ifdef and always check with ALL may not hurt anybody.
I dunno.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]