Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] i18n: mark OPTION_NUMBER (-NUM) for translation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jiang Xin <worldhello.net@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> 2013/2/6 Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx>:
>> I somehow suspect that this is going in a direction that makes this
>> piece of code much less maintainable.
>>
>> Look at the entire function and see how many places you do fprintf
>> on strings that are marked with _().  short_name and long_name are
>> not likely to be translated, but everything else is, especially
>> multiple places that show _(opts->help) neither of these patches
>> touch.
>>
>> I wonder if it makes more sense to add a helper function that
>> returns the number of column positions (not bytes) with a signature
>> similar to fprintf() and use that throughout the function instead.
>
> I agree, a helper named 'utf8_fprintf' in utf8.c is better.
> I will send a patch latter.

Yeah, the idea of a helper function I agree with; I am not thrilled
with the name utf8_fprintf() though.  People use the return value of
fprintf() for error detection (negative return value means an error)
most of the time (even though non-negative value gives the number of
bytes shown), but the primary use of the return value from the
utf8_fprintf() function will be to get the display width, and the
name does not quite capture that.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]