On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 01:17:57PM +0100, Marco Costalba wrote: > On 1/8/07, Yann Dirson <ydirson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >Since v0.11, StGIT creates references to keep a hand on patch logs. > >This has the unfortunate side-effect that "gitk --all" suddenly shows > >all those very annoying, and soon becomes unusable on > >repositories for which was very convenient. > > > > Normally you only need branch names > > gitk/qgit --all --> practically equivalent to --> gitk/qgit <list of > branch names> Not exactly. While qgit has knowledge of StGIT stacks and displays unapplied patches [1], gitk does not, and requesting a branch only shows the applied patches. I have no opinion whether gitk should be taught about them, but I'd like it to be usable on them anyway. One thing that qgit also does not show, but which I regularly use when viewing StGIT stacks in gitk, is the ancestry of unapplied patches (eg. you can see at first glance whether an unapplied patch is uptodate, or has not been ported yet atop the currently-applied ones. [1] BTW, as of 1.5.3 it displays them backwards, causing all sors of problems - I've not yet collected all of my comments for you, but at least that one is sent now ;) Best regards, -- Yann. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html