Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> Am I really the only one that doesn't see the "--print" change as >> hiding an option and sees burying "tracking" in the text as >> qualitatively different? > > Sorry, but I do not understand the question. > > We are hiding/burying the "--print" option to make it clear that it > is not a member with the same footing as others belonging to the > group of options to the command. It is accepted, but there is no > reason for the user to choose it over --normalize. > > We want to make sure that "tracking" does not appear as if it is a > member of the pull.default set with equal rights as others. It is > accepted, but there is no reason for the user to choose it over > "upstream". Now I re-read the proposed update, I think it is an improvement over a straight revert in that it makes it clear that 'tracking' does not belong, but I still think it is better to make it a sidenote to the 'upstream'. It makes the connection between the two stronger. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html