--- Junio C Hamano <junkio@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > I guess, what I want is still to be able to "see" remotes/
> > when I do "git branch".
>
> Then do not use "remotes/" but hang everything underneath
> "heads/" (or "git branch -a").
>
> Of course, the next complaint from you would be that the latest
> git-clone would not make the traditional layout, but ...
What I meant was something of the lines of "git branch -r".
As I said, I don't mind the new way of seprating remote
branches per repo as is done by remotes/*/ .
> We've taken "one step at a time" by first introducing separate
> remote layout as an option, taught 'git branch' the needed
> options such as -a and -r, and then made this the default
> layout. It still looks _different_ to me from what I am used
> to, but that's just traditionalist speaking and I cannot really
> deny the advantage of the separate remote layout offers. In
> other words, we have been doing "one step at a time".
Me neither. I also think there is an advantage of separately
tracking remotes as per remotes/*/ , so that organization is
better, i.e. per remote repo.
Luben
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html