This is fewer lines of code, but more importantly, fixes a
bogus pointer offset. We are looking for "tar." in the
section, but later assume that the dot we found is at offset
9, not 3. This is a holdover from an earlier iteration of
767cf45 which called the section "tarfilter".
As a result, we could erroneously reject some filters with
dots in their name, as well as read uninitialized memory.
Reported by (and test by) René Scharfe.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx>
---
This obviously replaces René's patch. It might make more sense to just
put his patch onto maint, and build this on top; then this patch can get
squashed into the next one (which just updates the uninteresting
callsites).
archive-tar.c | 10 +---------
t/t5000-tar-tree.sh | 3 ++-
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/archive-tar.c b/archive-tar.c
index 0ba3f25..68dbe59 100644
--- a/archive-tar.c
+++ b/archive-tar.c
@@ -325,20 +325,12 @@ static int tar_filter_config(const char *var, const char *value, void *data)
static int tar_filter_config(const char *var, const char *value, void *data)
{
struct archiver *ar;
- const char *dot;
const char *name;
const char *type;
int namelen;
- if (prefixcmp(var, "tar."))
+ if (match_config_key(var, "tar", &name, &namelen, &type) < 0 || !name)
return 0;
- dot = strrchr(var, '.');
- if (dot == var + 9)
- return 0;
-
- name = var + 4;
- namelen = dot - name;
- type = dot + 1;
ar = find_tar_filter(name, namelen);
if (!ar) {
diff --git a/t/t5000-tar-tree.sh b/t/t5000-tar-tree.sh
index ecf00ed..517ae04 100755
--- a/t/t5000-tar-tree.sh
+++ b/t/t5000-tar-tree.sh
@@ -283,7 +283,8 @@ test_expect_success 'setup tar filters' '
test_expect_success 'setup tar filters' '
git config tar.tar.foo.command "tr ab ba" &&
git config tar.bar.command "tr ab ba" &&
- git config tar.bar.remote true
+ git config tar.bar.remote true &&
+ git config tar.invalid baz
'
test_expect_success 'archive --list mentions user filter' '
--
1.8.1.rc1.10.g7d71f7b
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html