On 01/13/2013 11:20 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: > After a quick survey of various distros, I think it is very unlikely > that we will see "distros move on to newer cvsps, leaving cvsimport > broken" situation. If anything, it is more like "distros decide to > ignore the new cvsps, until it is made to work with cvsimport" [*1*]. A better predictor of the distros' decisions is probably which other packages depend on cvsps. As one data point: on Debian squeeze and on Ubuntu precise, only two packages depend on cvsps (git-cvs and bzr-cvsps-import) and one suggests it (chora2, "a code repository viewing component for horde framework"). So also by this standard they are unlikely to feel a lot of pressure to update quickly to cvsps3. > I think it is probably sensible to [...] > > Agreed? Yes, I agree that what you propose is a good strategy. Michael -- Michael Haggerty mhagger@xxxxxxxxxxxx http://softwareswirl.blogspot.com/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html