Junio C Hamano writes: > Stepan Koltsov <stepan.koltsov@> writes: >> stgit fails to export empty patches: >> >> % stg new empty-patch -m 'asasas' >> Now at patch "empty-patch" >> % stg export empty-patch >> Checking for changes in the working directory ... done >> fatal: unrecognized input >> stg export: git failed with code 128 >> zsh: exit 2 stg export empty-patch >> >> % stg --version >> Stacked GIT 0.16-3-g67cf >> git version 1.7.9.1 >> Python version 2.7.1 (r271:86832, Jul 31 2011, 19:30:53) >> [GCC 4.2.1 (Based on Apple Inc. build 5658) (LLVM build 2335.15.00)] > I don't use (or read the sources to) StGIT, but isn't the whole point of > "stg export" to "convert your StGIT patches into patch files"? For an > empty commit, what is an appropriate output? IOW, is it reasonable to > have an empty commit in your history if you are planning to "stg export" > it? Here's another example where the functionality is useful: https://github.com/Hobo/agility-gitorial-patches is used to build http://cookbook.hobocentral.net/tutorials/agility Each commit/patch becomes a step in the tutorial. Some tutorial steps don't have any code attached to them. In the past, an export of an empty commit would yield a patch where the last three lines were > --- > 0 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > The latest version of stgit along with git v1.6 eliminates the error. A bisection identifies cc64b318f26c9e176c4f07b1a459a86e7a04c4eb as the source of the problem. Thanks, Bryan -- View this message in context: http://git.661346.n2.nabble.com/bugreport-stgit-cannot-export-empty-patch-tp7559494p7574691.html Sent from the git mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html