Re: [PATCH 03/19] reset.c: pass pathspec around instead of (prefix, argv) pair

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 2:26 AM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> We use the path arguments in two places in reset.c: in
>> interactive_reset() and read_from_tree(). Both of these call
>> get_pathspec(), so we pass the (prefix, arv) pair to both
>> functions. Move the call to get_pathspec() out of these methods, for
>> two reasons: 1) One argument is simpler than two. 2) It lets us use
>> the (arguably clearer) "if (pathspec)" in place of "if (i < argc)".
>> ---
>> If I understand correctly, this should be rebased on top of
>> nd/parse-pathspec. Please let me know.
>
> Yeah, this will conflict with the get_pathspec-to-parse_pathspec
> conversion Duy has been working on.

Or I could hold off nd/parse-pathspec if this series has a better
chance of graduation first. Decision?
-- 
Duy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]