Ralf Thielow wrote:
> It's actually my own usecase :). The bugtracker I'm using is able
> to create relationships between issues and related commits. It
> expects that a part of the commit message contains the issue number
> in format "#<issueId>". So I need to use a cleanup mode different
> from "default" to keep the commentary. The mode I'd use is "whitespace",
> "verbatim" is also possible.
Hm, so "whitespace-when-editing" would be the ideal setting.
Would it be confusing if the '[commit] cleanup' setting only took
effect when launching an editor (and not with -F, -C, or -m)? My
first impression is that I'd like that behavior better, even though
it's harder to explain.
[...]
> When a user uses a script/importer which expects that the "default" option
> is used without setting it explicitly, and then the user changes the default,
> isn't it the users fault if that would break things?
Consider the following series of events.
1. My friend writes an importer that uses the "git commit" command.
I like it and start using it.
2. Another friend writes a blog post about the '[commit] cleanup'
setting. I like it and start using it.
3. I try to use the importer again.
4. Years later, I notice the commit messages are corrupted in the
imported history.
It's hard to assign blame. I guess it's my fault. ;)
[...]
> I'll add a sentence of my bugtracker example to it. I think many developers
> are using such a tool, so it'd makes sense.
Thanks, sounds good.
Regards,
Jonathan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html