[PATCH v2 4/5] format-patch: pick up correct branch name from symbolic ref

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



find_branch_name() assumes to take refs/heads/<branch>. But we also
have symbolic refs, such as HEAD, that can point to a valid branch in
refs/heads and do not follow refs/heads/<branch> syntax. Remove the
assumption and apply normal ref resolution. After all it would be
confusing if rev machinery resolves a ref in one way and
find_branch_name() another.

Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@xxxxxxxxx>
---
 builtin/log.c           | 21 +++++++++------------
 t/t4014-format-patch.sh | 14 ++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/builtin/log.c b/builtin/log.c
index e7b7db1..039bf67 100644
--- a/builtin/log.c
+++ b/builtin/log.c
@@ -1016,8 +1016,8 @@ static char *find_branch_name(struct rev_info *rev)
 {
 	int i, positive = -1;
 	unsigned char branch_sha1[20];
-	struct strbuf buf = STRBUF_INIT;
-	const char *branch;
+	const char *ref;
+	char *full_ref, *branch = NULL;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < rev->cmdline.nr; i++) {
 		if (rev->cmdline.rev[i].flags & UNINTERESTING)
@@ -1029,16 +1029,13 @@ static char *find_branch_name(struct rev_info *rev)
 	}
 	if (positive < 0)
 		return NULL;
-	strbuf_addf(&buf, "refs/heads/%s", rev->cmdline.rev[positive].name);
-	branch = resolve_ref_unsafe(buf.buf, branch_sha1, 1, NULL);
-	if (!branch ||
-	    prefixcmp(branch, "refs/heads/") ||
-	    hashcmp(rev->cmdline.rev[positive].item->sha1, branch_sha1))
-		branch = NULL;
-	strbuf_release(&buf);
-	if (branch)
-		return xstrdup(rev->cmdline.rev[positive].name);
-	return NULL;
+	ref = rev->cmdline.rev[positive].name;
+	if (dwim_ref(ref, strlen(ref), branch_sha1, &full_ref) &&
+	    !prefixcmp(full_ref, "refs/heads/") &&
+	    !hashcmp(rev->cmdline.rev[positive].item->sha1, branch_sha1))
+		branch = xstrdup(full_ref + strlen("refs/heads/"));
+	free(full_ref);
+	return branch;
 }
 
 int cmd_format_patch(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
diff --git a/t/t4014-format-patch.sh b/t/t4014-format-patch.sh
index ec9ef9e..903a797 100755
--- a/t/t4014-format-patch.sh
+++ b/t/t4014-format-patch.sh
@@ -984,4 +984,18 @@ test_expect_success 'cover letter using branch description (3)' '
 	grep hello actual >/dev/null
 '
 
+test_expect_success 'cover letter using branch description (4)' '
+	git checkout rebuild-1 &&
+	test_config branch.rebuild-1.description hello &&
+	git format-patch --stdout --cover-letter master.. >actual &&
+	grep hello actual >/dev/null
+'
+
+test_expect_success 'cover letter using branch description (5)' '
+	git checkout rebuild-1 &&
+	test_config branch.rebuild-1.description hello &&
+	git format-patch --stdout --cover-letter -2 HEAD >actual &&
+	grep hello actual >/dev/null
+'
+
 test_done
-- 
1.8.0.rc2.23.g1fb49df

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]